Global Warming Hoax - Climategate

The debate on global warming has been reopened. And it never should have been closed in the first place. One of the principles of scientific research, study, and experimentation is that when you have a theory or if you make any claims whatsoever, you provide the scientific community with every single piece of information you have so that the entire scientific community can scrutinize your work and either validate the accuracy and integrity of your findings or find flaws that will either crush your findings altogether or offer opportunities to fill in the gap and move forward with your work in an effort to correct the errors, resubmitting your rework at a later date.

Such scrutiny is certainly not for the timid. Apparently it isn't for those who look to deceive all of mankind either. A real scientist is one that seeks truth and wants to find that truth badly enough that he or she is willing to subject themselves and their work to the rigors of validation. This being the normal expectation within the scientific community, why is it that we have a number of "scientists" who will not allow their "global warming" data to be reviewed by all of their peers? Why is it that the global warming debate has ceased to exist? How did we get from debating global warming to accepting it as a done deal almost overnight as if it had been properly validated? One word... Propaganda.

Most propaganda that we are subjected to is not recognized by a lot of people, and there is rarely the opportunity to fully expose it for what it is. Recently, however, a wonderful thing happened with regard to the global warming issue. Over 5,000 confidential documents (emails and email attachments) were exposed and made available to be scrutinized by anyone who wants to read through them. These documents show how the leading (faux) global warming scientists were colluding in order to perpetrate an enormous lie to the entire inhabitants of planet earth. Some emails discuss how to go about persecuting and getting fired any scientists that opposed their findings. Some emails discussed how to fake the data so that it would look like global warming was real. And it seems their coding from their computer model that (supposedly) calculates all of their (fake) data was also made available and has been reviewed by computer programmers that have concluded that the code was deliberately constructed to calculate and provide false data.

Isn't it great when people are caught in their lies? And this is a huge one that came to the surface not a moment too soon. Ok, so these people lied. So what? People on TV lie to us every day. Yes, they do. And some of those lies are bigger than we realize when we first hear about them. This is one of them.

The entire Cap and Trade scheme is based entirely on this false data. For those who are still confused about what cap and trade is, every single person on planet earth would be given a carbon footprint (the size of which would be mandated to us all by unelected, self-appointed scum who come to their conclusions based on lies and false data). So your carbon output allowance would be limited (Cap), and if you conserve and have any remaining excess, you can sell that excess to someone else (Trade). We would all basically be buying and selling carbon (because it is carbon that the fraudsters have branded as being the culprit of global warming.

Imagine what power you could wield by controlling one of the major components of life itself. The sun for instance. What if you patented the sun? How would that be? Every single human being on earth would owe you royalties every time they turned around. People tanning on the beach would have to pay you. People getting their vitamin D from standing in the sun would have to pay you. People growing crops would have to pay you. People who thought solar panels would save them money would now have to pay you. How long would it take before you became the richest and most powerful man or woman on earth? Not very long at all. And God help us all if you happen to be a corrupt and depraved psychopath with your new found money and power. Thank goodness no one owns the sun huh?

Now what about oxygen? How would it be to patent that? Everyone would have to pay you to breath (even indoors). Those who grow crops would have to pay for the right to have their plants create oxygen. And again, you would become filthy rich unlike anyone has ever seen. And like the Sun, thank goodness no one owns oxygen.

With that said, why in the hell would we allow any self-appointed group to basically OWN carbon and then tax the living crap out of us because of it?

Soon there will be the conference at Copenhagen where the elite among us (again, unelected officials) will discus the Lisbon Treaty. This treaty, if signed by President Obama, will be a major step toward (the long time planned) one-world government, consolidation of power, and taxing us into oblivion. Every single thing that we all buy will have a carbon tax on it, because something as basic as carbon is in just about every area of our lives. If you go over your Cap, you will be fined. If a one-child policy is mandated (like in China, and on the elite's agenda for us) and you give birth to a second child, you will be fined for the birth and fined every day thereafter for having unlawfully gone over your "one child" and over your carbon Cap. And if that happens, the next incremental step would be to have child "protective" services remove any extra infants or children from your home (this is already practiced in China). Every car would be taxed, every motorcycle, every truck. Meat would have a tax since cows and other farm animals all have the gall to exhale, burp, and fart carbon (remember all those government "tests" on cow farts and burps?). Our milk will be taxed for the same reason. Our pet food will be taxed a premium since elites don't like us having such useless critters, and those useless critters exhale carbon. We will pay tax on all plastics and every other material you can think of as long as it produces any carbon output. Coal will be taxed. Gas will be taxed. It goes on and on. You name it and in some way it will be taxed for it's contribution to carbon and global scamming (I mean warming). And then on top of all that, don't forget that everything we buy does not just show up on the store shelves from magical gatherings. They all got to their final locations by being transported from point A to point B by way of trucks, trains, and ships (all emitting carbon). So there will be carbon taxes on top of carbon taxes by the time anything gets to market. And will the corporations foot the bill? Hell no. They will do just like they always do and pass the cost onto us, thereby taxing the hell out of what's left of the middle class. And where will these taxes go? Will they go to your local government? No. Will they go to your state government? No. Will they even go to your overreaching and nosy federal government? No. Every single carbon tax will be paid to a group of unelected, self-appointed, and quite frankly evil group of people who's agenda is to become as powerful as they possibly can, while making you and me as poor as they can so that we do not have the wealth and resources to resist their up and coming tyrrany.

And how will this play into total control of the population? One simple example should spell it out. Let's say that many of us are protesting on a regular basis. And whether you agree with protesting or not, you can easily see that the government hates protesting. They sick the dogs on us (police), they refuse to answer our direct questions, and they hide from us. Well if they have a carbon tax in place, all these depraved officials have to do is get their unelected elite to impose additional taxes on carbon emitted by gasoline, thereby discouraging you from protesting, because it costs too much money to get to your protest. And all they would have to do is come up with another fake study to say that gasoline actually emits more carbon than we thought, so we have no choice but to raise taxes on gasoline. And better yet, they wouldn't say anything at all about raising taxes on gasoline. They would just raise the prices until we stayed home.

Anyone with a creative mind or someone with faith in humanity and our ability to develop and build new technologies can tell immediately that this carbon tax is a scam. These scum (I like that word) jump straight to stealing our money in order to "combat" "global warming?" Bullshit! Governments and elite are the ones who created the filth on this planet. Yes, the rest of us are culpable too, because we buy the things that generate it. But we have people in positions of power that are supposed to be a consolidation of us all and act as leverage toward doing the right thing. For decades we have had the technology to build cars that would drastically reduce gasoline consumption, if not outright eliminate it. Where were our elite overlords? Where was our wonderful government? Were they investing in such technology? Were they doing everything they could to bring it to market? No. Of course not. They actually did the opposite and work hard to prevent such technologies. And they do it for two reasons. Power and manipulation. Anyone with eyeballs, or even just ears, has observed how oil and gasoline have been used to manipulate entire nations and the entire planet. Efficient cars and trucks would have little to no need for oil, thereby taking their ability to manipulate away from those who would be our gods. And they will be damned to hell if they are going to let anyone take that power from them.

The same with solar. Where have they been? Why was it that for so long the leader in solar technology was some out of the way third world nation? Did anyone with the power to tax, instead look to divert money into solar? For hell's sake, just a small fraction of what we spend on killing people and policing the world would have pushed solar far enough by now that nearly all of us would have panels on our homes and have no home energy bills. And if such technologies were abundant, there would be no need to build nuclear plants. And wouldn't it be interesting to see if an abundance of energy technologies like solar would cause the Iranians to just say, "Ok, no more nuclear research, we have what we want now." But if our elite and government suppress solar technology by not investing and supporting it, they can accuse any nation that is truly seeking a source of energy of being terrorists who are looking to build weapons for mass destruction and using it as an excuse to anhilate yet another country resistent to their tyranny.

We have the ability to make this planet a wonderful place and for prosperity to be far beyond anything we've imagined. But a tiny minority (hundreds at the most) are more interested in power and manipulation, working tirelessly to keep us from reaching such levels. And all because they seek to keep such a way of life to themselves and not allow the average citizen of the world a piece of it. It seems that their real self confidence and self worth isn't what it's cracked up to be. After all, if we are all afforded the same level of prosperity as they have, they would become insignificant and hidden amongst the rest of us. And due to their gauge of self worth, they would be tormented for having to be like everybody else. Well boo bloody hoo... Get your toys from the sandbox and piss the hell off back to your home where you can cry on your big pillow.

We out number them by the billions. It's damned time we started acting like it.

Listen to Lord Christopher Monckton talk about the hoax in the video here:

MEP Reprimanded For Exposing EU Dictatorship

Paul Joseph Wason
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, November 26, 2009

An astounding exchange took place in the European Union Parliament earlier this week when MEP Nigel Farage was reprimanded for daring to expose the fact that the EU is an authoritarian dictatorship ruled by unelected bureaucrats to the detriment of national sovereignty. Farage effectively broke a tyrannical 1999 law that states it is illegal to criticize the EU.

People like European Commission President Manuel Barroso squirmed and scowled as Farage openly savaged EU elitists for their lies and cronyism.

Farage wasted no time in going after the EU over their dictatorial policies, stating, “It’s taken you eight and a half years of bullying, of lying, of ignoring democratic referendums to get this treaty through (referring to the Lisbon Treaty)”.

Farage then attacked the appointment of Van Rompuy as the first EU President, highlighting that he was merely a pliable front man for Barroso.

“But at least he’s an elected politician unlike Baroness Ashton,” said Farage, referring to the woman who landed the job of High Representative for Foreign Affairs.

“In some ways she’s ideal isn’t she ,” said Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party. “She has never had a proper job, and has never been elected to anything in her life, so I guess she’s perfect for this European Union.”

As soon as Farage hit his stride in revealing the dictatorial nature of the EU, he was immediately reprimanded by President of the European Parliament, Jerzy Buzek, who said he would like to “put down” Farage and later warned him for the “tone” Mr. Farage used in criticizing”important EU people”.

As we have seen in the past, the EU is very sensitive about anyone discussing the fact that they represent a dictatorial body.

The Nazis killed people who spoke out against the Third Reich, whereas the EU has implemented an altogether more efficient solution – simply kill their free speech instead.

Earlier this year, a Dutch MP was refused entry to Britain because his political opinions were deemed offensive under EU laws. Euro MP’s have consistently attempted to ban the “dangerous and unregulated blogosphere” in an attempt to shut down free speech on the Internet. Under the 1999 ruling of the European Court Of Justice (case 274/99), it is illegal to criticize the EU and the EU is on a mission to outlaw any national political parties that do not pander to the European federal superstate agenda.

Farage continued by highlighting the fact that Ashton represented the EU’s agenda in a “post-democratic age,” where people are selected by the elite for high power positions rather than elected by the people.

“She married well, she married an advisor and a friend and a supporter of Tony Blair and got put in the House of Lords, when she was put in the House of Lords she was given one big job, and the job was to get the Lisbon Treaty through the House of Lords, and to do so pretending that it was entirely different to the EU Constitution…and she vigorously crushed any attempt in the House of Lords for the British people to have a referendum,” said Farage at which point EU bureaucrats, upset that their tyranny was being openly discussed in the EU Parliament, began attempting to silence Farage by shouting and clapping, as Barroso looked visibly shaken.

Farage responded to one heckler by stating, “Well at least I’ve been elected sir, unlike her, she’s not been elected and the people don’t have the power to remove her.”

As EU bureaucrats continued to heckle Farage, he explained how Ashton had taken large donations from a prominent member of the Communist Party in Great Britain in her role as Treasurer for the CND, demanding answers on why she had taken money from someone who represented an organization staunchly opposed to western democracy.

“Did she take money from enemies of the west, that question must be answered,” stated Farage.

Farage then accused MEP’s of “betraying their national democracies” in allowing Lisbon to pass and warned that an avalanche of new laws would follow, before calling for a national referendum in the UK to decide whether Britain should leave the EU. The camera then cut back to Barroso who looked like he was fuming at the fact that someone had dared stand up to the almighty European Union and expose their authoritarian and dictatorial nature.

After Buzek warned him again over “certain expressions” he was using, Farage attempted to find out what he had said that was so offensive, before a Socialist MEP babbled out some barely comprehensible globalist rhetoric in a lame attempt to counter Farage’s incisive speech.

“With respect I think you’ve completely missed the point,” responded Farage, “Because twice you said ‘the people that were elected last week’ – they have not been elected, that is the point that I am making and in the case of Baroness Ashton she has never been elected to public office in her entire life, she takes an enormously powerful job and the peoples of Europe do not have the power to hold her to account and to remove her and that fundamentally is what is wrong with this whole European Union, it’s all about bureaucracy versus democracy.”

The foundations for the EU and ultimately the Euro single currency were laid by the secretive Bilderberg Group in the mid-1950’s. Bilderberg’s owned leaked documents prove that the agenda to create a European common market and a single currency were formulated by Bilderberg in 1955. One of the group’s principle founders was H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, a former Nazi SS officer.

But the ideological framework for the European Union goes back even further, to the 1940’s when top Nazi economists and academics outlined the plan for a single European economic community, an agenda that was duly followed after the end of the second world war.

As we have highlighted in the past, Nazism and the EU have some very disturbing parallels. Indeed, the two are fundamentally intertwined and the origins of the EU can be traced directly back to the Nazis.

The fact that the EU was a brainchild of top Nazi economists and industrialists, formulated as a means of preserving dictatorial power and then implemented by a former Nazi working under the auspices of the Bilderberg Group in 1955, proves that the entire European Union system is poisoned with a legacy and a raison d’être of totalitarianism.

This is becoming increasingly obvious in the 21st century as popular social movements across Europe rise up to oppose the blatant power grab being undertaken by the EU via the Lisbon Treaty, which was forced through in Ireland earlier this year despite the population having already rejected it in a previous national referendum.

Just like Hitler repeatedly polled Germans of the 1930’s until he could intimidate them into delivering the result he wanted, the European Union has followed the same method. The ratification of the Lisbon Treaty was what enabled the EU to create the post of a European President in the first place, and there seems little doubt that Van Rompuy and Ashton will do everything in their power to accelerate the move towards Bilderberg’s ultimate goal – a dictatorial European federal superstate that completely swallows up what tattered shreds of sovereignty member states have left.

Watch the clip of Farage below.

ObamaCare - Government Claims One Thing, Analysis Describes Quite Another

"According to an analysis published Wednesday by the CBO and JCT, this subsidy will cost taxpayers $196 billion per year by 2019 but will still leave 24 million people uninsured in America, about 8 million of whom will be illegal aliens. The estimate assumes that there would otherwise be about 55 million uninsured people in the United States."

Based on the above quote from the article below, the only achievements of the health care bill would be to take (steal) more money from the tax payers, and for the government to get their grubby fingers significantly further into our lives. This is nothing more than further consolidation of power and control. How can people not ask, "What is the government's true motivation in passing this bill?" If 16 million legal citizens (24 mil minus 8 mil illegals) will not be insured, then one can easily conclude that insuring the entire population is not their goal. In my world, saying you're doing one thing while doing something completely different is called lying. When someone lies, they do not want you to know what is really going on. And when they don't want you to know what is really going on, and they lie to you in order to manipulate your perception, they do so, because you would not have anything to do with their agenda if you truly knew what was going on. I realize all this is quite obvious, and you may be thinking that pointing out the obvious is unnecessary, but how many people do you see every day who ignore the obvious lies right under their noses? How many of them make excuses? How many of them have the illogical urge to pick a political party and stand in it's defense no matter what lies that party spews forth? And if you think the 8 million illegal aliens will not be using our hospitals and that you and I will not be paying for them to do so, you're mistaken. One only has to look at the undeserved rights illegals have already. In some cases they actually have more rights than we do (i.e., you and I have to provide social security numbers and whatever else a bank wants in order to identify who we are before opening a bank account. An illegal alien doesn't have to provide any such thing. That means you and I and our money transactions are being tracked and monitored to ensure compliance on taxation, etc., while an illegal can operate pretty much anonymously).

CBO: By 2019, Taxpayers Will Pay $196 Billion A Year for Obamacare, But 24 Million People Will Remain Uninsured

Thursday, November 19, 2009
By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief
CNSNew.com

(CNSNews.com) - Under the health care bill introduced by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Wednesday, by 2019 taxpayers will be paying $196 billion per year to subsidize other people’s health insurance coverage, but there still will be 24 million uninsured people in America, according to the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation.

Reid’s proposal mandates that all individuals legally resident in the United States purchase health insurance and offers subsidies to people making up to 400 percent of the poverty level ($88,200 for a family of four) to purchase insurance as long as they buy a federally regulated and approved plan sold in a federally regulated insurance exchange.

According to an analysis published Wednesday by the CBO and JCT, this subsidy will cost taxpayers $196 billion per year by 2019 but will still leave 24 million people uninsured in America, about 8 million of whom will be illegal aliens. The estimate assumes that there would otherwise be about 55 million uninsured people in the United States.

"The gross cost of the coverage expansions, consisting of exchange subsidies, the net costs of expanded eligibility for Medicaid, and tax credits for employers: Those provisions have an estimated cost of $196 billion in 2019, and that cost is growing at about 8 percent per year toward the end of the 10-year budget window. As a rough approximation, CBO assumes continued growth at about that rate during the following decade," says the joint CBO and JCT analysis.

“By 2019, CBO and JCT estimate, the number of nonelderly people who are uninsured would be reduced by about 31 million, leaving about 24 million nonelderly residents uninsured (about one-third of whom would be unauthorized immigrants),” says the CBO and JCT analysis.

Table 3 in the report indicates that when the health-insurance mandate and subsidy program becomes fully operational in 2014 there will be 35 million uninsured in the United States and this number will drop to 23 million by 2018 before rising back to 24 million in 2019. The report does not indicate how many uninsured people will remain after 2019, or whether the upward trend between 2018 and 2019 will continue.

Table 3 also shows that the cost to taxpayers of paying the insurance subsidies in the bill as well as the cost for increased eligibility for Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) instituted under the bill will dramatically escalate over the next decade.

In 2010, the year of the next congressional election, the gross cost of the subsidies is expected to be $0. In 2012, the year of the next presidential election, the gross cost of the subsidies in the bill is expected to be only $4 billion. But in 2014, the costs are expected to dramatically escalate to $48 billion for the year. From that point on, the costs increase every year, jumping to $147 billion by 2016 and then to $196 billion by 2019.

Correction: An earlier posting of this story inaccurately said that the cost of subsidizing health insurance under the Reid health care bill would be $194 billion by 2019. The correct figure is $196 billion.

Geithner Taking More Of A Beating

Geithner Takes A Beating

Shotgun - Remington 870

AR15 vs AK47

Personal genome sequence is must-have accessory for billionaires

Chris Ayres
Los Angeles

For $70,000 (£42,000), it may not seem like a very good deal: all you get is a polished silver box containing a USB drive on a black velvet tray.

It is the information that is on the drive, however, that counts.

In fact, the data is so valuable that the silver box has become the latest must-have accessory for some of the wealthiest individuals on the planet. So far, fewer than a hundred members of the global elite have managed to get their hands on one — including a handful of Britons, The Times has learned— and the waiting list is growing by the month.

The USB drive contains a digital version of its owner’s human genome, sequenced and decoded and ready to be browsed on a home computer. It is hoped that such information could soon tell an individual what he or she is likely to die of — and, by extension, what can be done to put off the day of reckoning.

“As recently as 2007, there were only three personalised genomes on the planet,” says Jorge Conde, Chief Executive Officer of Knome, an American company offering the service. “Even last year there were more people who had walked on the Moon than had been sequenced.”

The cost of the procedure is dropping fast, and while $70,000 is a significant expense by even a Wall Street banker’s standards, it seems inconsequential when compared with the $3 billion cost of decoding the very first genome — a project that was completed in 2003, after 13 years. Today the same process takes six to eight weeks. By 2015, says Mr Conde, personalised sequencing is likely to cost under $1,000, and take only days.

For the moment, however, having your own sequenced genome remains the ultimate billionaire’s bragging right — and Knome is happy to indulge in James Bond-style theatrics. The company will dispatch a private doctor to virtually any address in the world to collect the necessary blood sample, while delivery of the silver USB drive is an event in itself. “I’ve been in the homes of a few of my clients, and a lot of them put their USB drives in display cases,” says Mr Conde, 32, who is based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “Others keep them locked up in safes along with their jewellery.”

The services of Knome and its main rival, Illumina, based in San Diego, are not to be confused with cheaper DNA analysis firms such as 23andMe, founded by Anne Wojcicki, wife of the Google co-founder Sergey Brin. It uses a saliva-based sample to provide a snapshot of a person’s DNA, rather than a fully sequenced genome. Nevertheless, Ms Wojcicki recently credited 23andMe with discovering her husband’s high risk of developing Parkinson’s disease.

Many scientists are not as convinced of the argument for expensive personalised genome sequencing — until, that is, a much larger database of genomes is established, and research methods improve. Even Mr Conde admits that the best Knome can offer clients is a guide to the various “unique variances” within their DNA, which could indicate how likely they are to develop certain conditions.

However, Knome says its service is designed to be future-proof. By hooking up a Knome USB drive to a KnomeXplorer computer browser, clients can upload new gene/disease associations as they are discovered. “It’s kind of like iTunes,” says Mr Conde.

Although none of Knome’s clients were willing to talk publicly about the decision to be sequenced — given the Wall Street background of some of the individuals, there are concerns about appearing profligate — the first person to have his genome sequenced by the company is known to be Dan Stoicescu, a Romanian millionaire who lives in Switzerland. He has described himself as a “transhumanist” who believes that life can be extended indefinitely through nanotechnology and artificial intelligence. When asked why he felt compelled to spend $350,000 — the going rate at the time — he said: “I’d rather spend my money on my genome than a Bentley.”

Quote

"I think that this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that was ever gathered together at the White House, with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone."

- JFK

Comments

You guys are the quietest visitors to any blog I've seen. If it weren't for other methods of tracking I would never suspect anyone was visiting here. Please, make yourself at home. This is as much your blog as it is mine. By participating, you can have a stake in what takes place here. Feel free to add comments to this and any post. Through posting comments, I can get a better feel for what you all want to see more of. Or if I see a particular concern you have, I can research that concern and get my findings posted for you. Of course, you don't need to post comments just because I solicited them. You should only post comments if you feel compelled to do so. I just want you to know that your comments are welcome and that you can say whatever you like. For those of you that might not be aware, there is a link at the bottom of each post that says "Comments." If you click on that link, you will have a text field appear that you can type your comment into. Then just click submit and you're comment will be posted.

The Corporation

If a corporation were psychoanalyzed, it would most assuredly be labeled a psychopath. Is it any wonder that as normal caring human beings we so often find ourselves at odds with corporations? We are constantly manipulated by them as consumers and U.S. citizens, and how frustrating and psychologically demoralizing are so many of the jobs we have with these same corporations as employees?

The following film delves pretty deeply into the subject of corporations and the damage they do to our society and the role they play in every aspect of our lives.

The film is 3 hours long, so get something to eat and drink, and go pee first. You will hear references to the film being 3 parts, but I have all parts included in the one video.

Transhuman Eugenics

Every day that passes more and more people are waking up to the truth around them. Our government is a mere puppet show. The real powers are behind the scenes. And these powers have used the Federal Reserve as their money machine to fund their global agenda. What is this agenda? Many of you have come to realize that a New World Order is gaining momentum, and that within that New World Order the plan is to have a one-world government where the bankers that have hijacked our governments will rule over the entire planet (in many ways, they already do).

If you're curious about the future in the minds of the self-appointed elite who literally believe they are superior to the rest of us, you can watch the following film and see what they have been working on for a very long time, in an effort to control "their" future. You may have heard about their agenda to reduce world population to 500 million (currently 6.7 billion as of 2008). What you might not be aware of is their move toward technology that they believe will significantly extend one's lifespan far beyond the current world average of 65 (U.S. Average is between 78 and 80). Whether or not they accomplish this and despite when, or if, it is to take place, the important thing here is that it is their intention. And that intention of extended lifespan is not likely to include you and me (providing such technology gained sufficient momentum and was obtained in our lifetime).

Let's do a little deduction. The elites want the world population down to only 500 million. But their agenda includes obtaining the technology to dramatically increase one's lifespan. Do you recognize the contradiction here? If they manage to dramatically extend lifespans for all of us, our world population will explode to an amazing rate, and I assure you they do not want that. It shouldn't take you but a few seconds to realize that should they achieve such technology, that technology will be for "them" and them only. And the rest of us (those who are left) will serve the state in whatever capacity they see fit. And think about this... If part of their agenda is to get the population down to 500 million, there are only a few ways of doing that. One would be to ask us all to stop making babies. Do you think that will work? There are already all kinds of contraceptive "protections" available to us, but we keep populating the planet anyway. Some feel that they are to populate the planet, because God said to. Some want children, because having a family is important to them. Some want children, because they want to live vicariously through them. Some want children, because they can milk the government. Then there are those that don't want children, but don't use protection and end up with children anyway. Some don't want children and don't care how long a path of children they leave behind as they go from woman to woman, like Johnny Appleseed. No matter the reasons, either moral or immoral, human beings procreate, and they do it a lot. One way of slowing down population growth is prosperity. The United States, for instance, is very low on birth rates. Much of this is due to our freedoms, liberties, and our education in general (even if the quality of our education IS on a down trend). That being the case, our elitist rulers could put their efforts toward creating prosperity for all nations and all people. But hold on! *screeching rubber as the brakes are applied* That just won't do. You see, doing that on a global basis would mean that the elites have to give up far too much leverage over the rest of us. In the balance of things, if all nations are given more freedom, liberty and more prosperity, that means that someone somewhere is giving up control. World leaders giving up control? Please, do tell me another.

The elitist rulers are not going to give up their unrighteous dominion over us, so you can forget any chance of their pushing for more freedom and liberty (even if they say otherwise). This leaves us two main options left. One, propaganda. Two, intervention and force. How effective can propaganda be? Sex is pretty powerful stuff, and based on what I've witnessed, propaganda does an amazing job up to the point that people are inconvenienced from your interfering with their trivial pastimes (i.e., if everyone pulled together and united, our country would be amazingly better, as well as the world, but getting involved is too inconvenient for what seems to be the lazy majority). So something as powerful as sex is likely to be relatively immune to propaganda for the most part. Especially those living in squalor that have little to do for enjoyment. That leaves intervention and force. What might be some ways to accomplish this? War, for one thing. Henry Kissinger once said, "Soldiers are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns of foreign policy." It should be noted that Kissinger was Dick Cheney's adviser, and he cannot set foot in many nations, because he would be arrested on the spot as a war criminal. He is just one of many elitists who don't give one rat's ass about the rest of us and has a clear disrespect for anyone willing to risk their life for their country. Does he sound like anyone who cares one bit about people dieing in war? No. He sure doesn't. Now take it one step further. If he and people like him are not bothered by the deaths from war, what is stopping them from deliberately creating war as part of their agenda of depopulating the planet? Hundreds of thousands and millions of people killed is one step closer to their goal. What might be some other ways of intervening? Well, do we know what's in our water? Do we know what's in our food? Do we know what's in our medications? Our vaccines? You can trust people in power if you'd like. Knock yourself out. But when I drink water, it's filtered. When I eat I try to eat organic foods. On the rare occasion I go to the doctor, I research what he's giving me. And if it's something where I can tough it out, I don't take any medication. Why do you suppose there is mercury and squalene in the H1N1 vaccine? I'm not a freakin' thermometer so please, someone tell me why I need mercury inside my body.

What was to be a short intro for the following film has turned into a rant, of which I could go on and on about for a good long time. So I'll stop here and let you watch the film in peace, even though there isn't much that is peaceful about it.

Enjoy! ... and be safe.

Water Storage

Many of you know how important it is to keep a supply of food storage in preparation for hard times that can come at any moment. Anything from losing your job to an interruption in food supplies or natural disaster can turn your life upside down overnight. And having a year supply of food can go a long way to putting you at ease. As part of your food storage, you need a solution for water. This can be quite a daunting task since crunching the numbers according to recommended daily intake of water means a whole lot of water taking up a whole lot of room if you aim to have a year supply.

According to the Mayo Clinic, you should drink roughly 64 oz of water per day (half a gallon). In that case 1/2 gallon multiplied by 365 days in a year comes to 182.5 gallons for one person per year of storage. If you use 55-gallon barrels to store your water in, you're talking about 4 barrels per person. Not too bad if you're on your own with some decent space. But if you have a family of say, a spouse and 4 children, that turns into 24 barrels. And if you're one of those who has 10 kids, that's 48 barrels. With a 2-foot diameter for each barrel, the 4 barrels will take up 16 sq. feet. The 24 barrels will take up 96 sq. feet. The 48 barrels will take up 192 sq. feet. Depending on your family size, that's a lot of living space taken up by just water, which isn't even being used until disaster strikes.

Now, lets look at the cost of just the barrels. If you buy a 55-gallon food-grade water storage barrel from me, you're going to spend $79.95 for each barrel. That's no cheap purchase when you have a family. Based on the 3 family sizes mentioned above, you're looking at, $320 for the single person, $1,919 for the family of 6, and $3,838 for the family of 12. Despite this cost, it's important to have water storage, and if you buy your barrels from me, you'll certainly make my day, but there is another option. What if I told you that you can buy a water unit that will generate water without being hooked up to any water supply, and that the unit will produce up to 7 gallons of water per day out of thin air? Some of you will know what I'm talking about already, and some of you might think I'm smoking crack in between my postings. Well, I'm happy to say I don't smoke crack. I can't afford it in this economy. There is, in fact, a unit that looks much like a standard water cooler that you might find in any office environment.



The difference is that this particular unit doesn't rely on a water supply line because it pulls moisture (humidity) from the air into it's intake and then collects and filters it into a reservoir, ready for you drink. If this unit generates 7 gallons of water per day, that's 2,555 gallons of water per year (the equivalent of 47 55-gallon barrels). And it takes up no more than 2 sq. feet. You can purchase this unit from a company called EcoloBlue for US $1,250. And right now they have a promotion where for $1 more you can get a gas-powered electric generator.

You might want some barrels for storage anyway, but at least with this unit you can have peace of mind while you build your water barrel supply, since you will have a continuous supply of fresh water. And with the generator that comes with it for only $1, you can still get water if the power goes out. My plan is to run one on solar so I don't have to be concerned about getting gas for the generator. Generators are great and very handy, but if whatever crisis comes along involves an interruption in gas supplies, a generator with only work for us until we run out of fuel (and storing large quantities of gas would be bloody expensive, not to mention dangerous and likely to require a permit for large quantities).

Hydroponic Gardening

Hydroponics is the method of growing plants within a reservoir of water and without using soil. This doesn't mean there is no medium used at all. The medium just isn't soil. The medium in this case might be, gravel, sand, crushed rocks or bricks or any other sterile medium.

Why Do Hydroponics?
By not using soil, you've immediately eliminated any pest problems that would originate from a soil substrate. And no weeds!!! Overall, there is significantly less maintenance involved. And even better, you can maximize the use of your space. You can grow a lot more in a much smaller area, which is of great importance for those with smaller yards, or even for those with no yards as they can take the growing indoors. Additionally, your crops will mature more rapidly and produce more fruits and vegetables. AND you will conserve a lot of water and chemicals. Where in traditional gardening your watering of your plants sends a huge portion of your water beyond the reach of your root system, your hydroponic system holds your water and chemicals in place just like a fish tank does, exposing you to only minimal evaporation.

Why Does Hydroponics Produce Superior Crops?
When planted in traditional soil, that soil can often leach both water and minerals from your plants. Even after you've applied fertilizer. If we can't be sure that the necessities for the plants to thrive are even getting to the plant, we have little control over what we end up with. And if your soil in your yard is of poor quality, you'll just be that much worse off. In a hydroponic system you apply specific chemicals in specific quantities at specific times to the water. In some systems, the roots of the plants are always in the water and when there is nothing to leach the water or the chemicals away, your plants are in nutrient heaven 24/7. Can you imagine the health and quality of your plants in this environment? And no more under watering or over watering. It's just not possible. It's important to note that there are different methods of hydroponics and not all methods involve your plants being in constant water. There is one method called "ebb and flow" for instance, where on a timer your plants are flooded with water and then that water is pulled back into its reservoir (this would be done around 6 or 8 times a day.

What Equipment Do I Need? The materials you'll need to start with all depends on what you want to accomplish. If you're just starting out, you'll probably go relatively small just to get used to the idea and to test the whole hydroponic theory to see for yourself if this method of growing is really superior to traditional methods. You might want to build your own system with raw materials or you might want to just buy a kit. And while you can do this for relatively little money, you could easily spend a whole lot by going overboard.

I suggest starting out small. And while you start out, read as much as you can on the subject and become familiar with the terminology and fundamentals. If you want to start out small, you can buy a product called, AeroGrow. You can actually place this unit right on your counter top. It includes lights, seeds, a water pump and anything else you need to get started. This is a really neat product and does work very well. Tell me it wouldn't be cool to be cooking in the kitchen and just reach over and pluck a tomato, lettuce, or pepper to include in your recipe. And no pesticides, no "frankenseeds" (with who knows what genes have been genetically altered), no driving to the store, and fresher than anything sitting in the produce section of your grocery store.

If you're looking to do your own gardening in order to eat healthier food or to ensure you even have food in order to become more self sufficient and better survive the tsunami of economic turmoil that seems to be coming, I can't emphasize enough the advantages to hydroponic gardening. A couple of things to consider... Depending on where you live and the degree of potential chaos that could ensue as the economy worsens, you may find that growing food outside is too risky. If someone sees your crops, they may want them for themselves. This is not to say that you wouldn't help a person out if they need it. But you want to be the one deciding who you help. You don't want some random, hungry criminal passing by to enter onto your property and help themselves. And your having crops in certain scenarios could give the impression that you're well to do by comparison and someone may decide that they would like to help themselves to the INSIDE of your home while they're at it.
Another big plus is that if you're growing food to survive, you're going to want as much growing time as you can get. If you grow indoors, you can grow year round. This can give some significant peace of mind compared to growing as much as you can in a few short months in a mad dash to store up for the winter. I still suggest storing up, but at least you know you have a continuous source of production. And for those concerned about the energy consumption, I just found some grow lights that are LED. Now that's cool... Literally.

Christmas is just around the corner and something like an AeroGrow is perfect. Rather than spend money on trivial stuff that won't be there for you when you really need it, get something that will help you take that next step to self sufficiency. And as always, you don't have to buy from me, but definitely buy this stuff from someone. Prepare now... Don't wait.

I'll get you some good videos soon. So far, I'm having a hard time finding any that would be worth your time, and I refuse to just post whatever in order to have them posted...

Simplicity and Truth

Thomas Jefferson said in 1802,

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

Read that and tell me that our forefathers are clueless farmers that couldn't have foreseen the future and all of it's "complexities." A decade or two ago, one would have read that and thought, "What? Here in America?" "How could such a thing ever happen here?" But now, it sure looks like Jefferson is warning us directly.

The more you read from people like Thomas Jefferson, the more you realize that he and others like him were far wiser than our current faux leaders would have you believe. Like when they tell us, "Oh, these are more complex times and call for more complex solutions." Pure BS. They try to make our forefathers sound like simpletons in order to control our perceptions and gain support for their sinister policies. The fact is, the fundamentals of truth, liberty, and freedom that our forefathers spoke of transcend across all time, all centuries, all ages. It is a simple concept. A powerful concept. Anyone who claims we live in a more complex world which needs more complex solutions, is either a liar, or one who has been led astray by a liar. The reason that one states such claims of complexity, is because they are working to conceal their deceit and criminal activities. It's meant to confuse you. And if you're confused, you assume you just don't get it, and you settle for understanding the surface of the issue and look no further to see what lies beneath. If I tell you the truth on any subject, you will likely understand in full. If I lie to you and make you believe something that is not true, it makes it even easier for me if I convince you that what I'm talking about is complex. And once you're convinced that it's complex, I have full control of your perception. Because now, you've decided it's too complex for you to understand in full. This leaves you no option other than to allow me or someone else to brainwash you into what I want you to think. I will concede that there are complexities and confusions in our world. But I would be willing to bet that almost all of them were created and perpetuated by straying from simplicity and truth.